Friday, May 2, 2014

Art History Everyone Should Know: Pablo Picasso


The entire course ($25) with additional texts
https://www.udemy.com/u/kenneymencher/
Join our facebook group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/SurveyArtHistory/

Picasso and Cubism
 
 
Pablo Picasso. 1881 - 1973
Science and Charity. 1897.
Oil on canvas. Museo Picasso, Barcelona, Spain.
Picasso. First Communion, c1897
from The Brittanica's entry on Pablo Picasso, Life and career
Early years
Pablo Picasso was the son of José Ruiz Blasco, a professor of drawing, and Maria Picasso López. His unusual adeptness for drawing began to manifest itself early, around the age of 10, when he became his father's pupil in La Coruña, where the family moved in 1891. From that point his ability to experiment with what he learned and to develop new expressive means quickly allowed him to surpass his father's abilities. In La Coruña his father shifted his own ambitions to those of his son, providing him with models and support for his first exhibition there at the age of 13.
The family moved to Barcelona in the autumn of 1895, and Pablo entered the local art academy (La Llotja), where his father had assumed his last post as professor of drawing. The family hoped that their son would achieve success as an academic painter, and in 1897 his eventual fame in Spain seemed assured; in that year his painting "Science and Charity," for which his father modeled for the doctor, was awarded an honorable mention in Madrid at the Fine Arts Exhibition.
The Spanish capital was the obvious next stop for the young artist intent on gaining recognition and fulfilling family expectations. Pablo Ruiz duly set off for Madrid in the autumn of 1897 and entered the Royal Academy of San Fernando. But finding the teaching there stupid, he increasingly spent his time recording life around him, in the cafés, on the streets, in the brothels, and in the Prado, where he discovered Spanish painting. He wrote: "The Museum of paintings is beautiful. Velázquez first class; from El Greco some magnificent heads, Murillo does not convince me in every one of his pictures." Works by these and other artists would capture Picasso's imagination at different times during his long career. Goya, for instance, was an artist whose works Picasso copied in the Prado in 1898 (a portrait of the bullfighter Pepe Illo and the drawing for one of the Caprichos, "Bien tirada está," which shows a Celestina [procuress] checking a young maja's stockings). These same characters reappear in his late work--Pepe Illo in a series of engravings (1957) and Celestina as a kind of voyeuristic self-portrait, especially in the series of etchings and engravings known as "Suite 347" (1968).
Picasso fell ill in the spring of 1898 and spent most of the remaining year convalescing in the Catalan village of Horta de Ebro in the company of his Barcelona friend Manuel Pallarès. When Picasso returned to Barcelona in early 1899, he was a changed man: he had put on weight, he had learned to live on his own in the open countryside, he spoke Catalan, and most importantly he had made the decision to break with his art school training and to reject his family's plans for his future. He even began to show a decided preference for his mother's surname, and more often than not he signed his works P.R. Picasso (by late 1901 he had dropped the Ruiz altogether).
In Barcelona Picasso moved among a circle of Catalan artists and writers whose eyes were turned toward Paris. These were his friends at the café Els Quatre Gats ("The Four Cats," styled after the Chat Noir ["Black Cat"] in Paris), where Picasso had his first Barcelona exhibition in February 1900, and they were the subjects of more than 50 portraits (in mixed media) in the show. In addition, there was a dark, moody "modernista" painting, "Last Moments" (later painted over), showing the visit of a priest to the bedside of a dying woman, a work that was accepted for the Spanish section of the Exposition Universelle in Paris in that year. Eager to see his own work in place and to experience Paris firsthand, Picasso set off in the company of his studio-mate Carles Casagemas ("Portrait of Carles Casagemas," 1899) to conquer, if not Paris, at least a corner of Montmartre.

Picasso, Pablo. Family of Saltimbanques
1905 oil on canvas, 2.128 x 2.296 m 
(83 3/4 x 90 3/8 in.)
Brittanica continued The move to Paris
Picasso finally made the decision to move permanently to Paris in the spring of 1904, and his work reflects a change of spirit and especially a change of intellectual and artistic currents. The traveling circus and saltimbanques became a subject he shared with a new and important friend, Guillaume Apollinaire. To both the poet and the painter these rootless wandering performers ("Girl Balancing on a Ball," 1905; "The Actor," 1905) became a kind of evocation of the artist's position in modern society. Picasso specifically made this identification in "Family of Saltimbanques" (1905), where he assumes the role of Harlequin and Apollinaire is the strongman (according to their mutual friend, the writer André Salmon).

 
 

Ife 13th Century

Benin 14th-15th Century

Benin 15th-16th Century

Benin 17th-19th Centuries
Much of Picasso's work is supposedly influenced by his appreciaition of so called primitive works of art from Africa, Oceana and other cultures.  There are many art historians who feel that Picasso's appropriation of the so called "primitive" is disrespectful.  The heart of this disrespect comes from the idea that the term "primitive" in itself might be incorrect when you apply it to cultures such as the art of African peoples.  Part of the debate comes from Europeans' mistaken notion that African Art has not eveolved yet and that it is unsophisticated.  For example, Ernst Gombrich (in his original theory of "schema and correction" believed that as art evolved it became more and more realistic.  However, if you look at the Benin art above, it evolves over time into a much more abstract and iconic form of representation.  This choice, to become more symbolic and less representational over time is a very sophisticated idea that parallels the developments in European and American Art during the late 19th and mid 20th Centuries.
According to the Tate Museum. (http://www.tate.org.uk/imap/pages/animated/keyterms.htm)
Primitivism
At the beginning of the twentieth century France, like most European countries, was a colonial power. Attitudes towards non-western countries, particularly African and Oceanic, were a mixture of fascination and disdain. The people of these countries and their cultures were labelled as ‘primitive’ and associated with often conflicting stereotypes such as savagery, nobility, simplicity, exoticism, mystery and paganism. Avant garde writers, philosophers and artists were inspired by ‘primitive’ art. They were disillusioned by the culture and values of their own society which they saw as corrupt and exhausted of ideas. In contrast, ‘primitive’ art seemed physically direct and emotionally charged. It was at once ancient and completely new and it pointed the way to systems of representation other than the naturalism that dominated academic art. The phenomenon of Primitivism also saw a reassessment of some of the first principles of art. What is it for? How does it affect us? How do we communicate through art? However the interest of artists in non-Western cultures was primarily formal and superficial rather than anthropological. Few had a sophisticated grasp of the civilizations from which they were borrowing.
Matisse and Picasso were both interested in 'primitive art' but they were attracted to different cultures for different reasons. Picasso’s Spanish heritage meant he was familiar with the simplified, stylised and monumental figures of Iberian sculpture. He was also interested in African art. Although he never visited the continent, he studied objects in the Paris ethnographic museum and made his own versions of totemic African carvings. Picasso was fascinated by their highly stylised representations of the body and also their function as ritual objects. Picasso was very superstitious and he believed in the magical and talisman properties of objects. For this reason he felt a personal affiliation with this aspect of African art.
Matisse collected African art and is thought to be responsible for introducing it to Picasso. He visited North Africa on several occasions, however it was Persian art that that had a more lasting influence on his work. Matisse was particularly interested in their use of pattern to create a sense of depth. Usually pattern has a flattening effect because it emphasises the surface of objects. In Persian miniatures different patterns are used to delineate different spatial areas. So for instance in an interior scene where we can see through an open door, down a corridor to a room beyond, the walls in the furthest room would have a different pattern from the walls of the corridor and of the main interior and this pattern would be used to describe the receding view.
Pablo Picasso. Les Demoiselles d' Avignon. 1907
oil on canvas 8'x7' MOMA
Make sure you read Stokstad's discussion of this painting. Form:  According to the Clevelend Museum of Art,(http://www.clevelandart.org/exhibcef/PicassoAS/html/1477098.html)
 
In 1907 Picasso shocked fellow artists with his painting Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Incorporating violent distortions of form and space, the painting synthesized Picasso’s recent studies of ancient Iberian and African sculpture. Early signs of Cubism appear in the radical breaking and reconstruction of space, the flattened forms, and the reversal of figure/ground relationships. Even Picasso found the painting so unsettling that he did not exhibit it for nearly a decade. Many art historians now recognize Le  Demoiselles d’Avignon as a landmark in the history of art, the first Cubist (or proto-Cubist) painting, and perhaps the most important painting of the 20th century.
Iconography: According to the Museum of Modern Art in New York, http://www.moma.org/collection/depts/paint_sculpt/blowups/paint_sculpt_006.html
 
Les Demoiselles d'Avignon is one of the most important works in the genesis of modern art. The painting depicts five naked prostitutes in a brothel; two of them push aside curtains around the space where the other women strike seductive and erotic poses—but their figures are composed of flat, splintered planes rather than rounded volumes, their eyes are lopsided or staring or asymmetrical, and the two women at the right have threatening masks for heads. The space, too, which should recede, comes forward in jagged shards, like broken glass. In the still life at the bottom, a piece of melon slices the air like a scythe.
The faces of the figures at the right are influenced by African masks, which Picasso assumed had functioned as magical protectors against dangerous spirits: this work, he said later, was his "first exorcism painting." A specific danger he had in mind was life-threatening sexual disease, a source of considerable anxiety in Paris at the time; earlier sketches for the painting more clearly link sexual pleasure to mortality. In its brutal treatment of the body and its clashes of color and style (other sources for this work include ancient Iberian statuary and the work of Paul Cézanne), Les Demoiselles d'Avignon marks a radical break from traditional composition and perspective.

Stokstad expands a bit on the iconography of this paintings and discusses the prepratory drawing at left.
Below are some of the images and masks that may have influenced Picasso's paintings.
 

Pablo Picasso. Les Demoiselles d' Avignon. 1907 
oil on canvas 8'x7' MOMA

Nok Culture c500 BCE - 200 CE
Nok Head 500BCE - 200CE terracotta 14 in

 

Picasso. Ma Jolie. 1911-12.
oil on canvas, 39"x25" MOMA
Form: The first thing one may notice when viewing this image is that it is subdued in color and incorporates mainly earthtones.  There is no obvious value structure and or illusionism employed in this image.  The paint is a medium impasto and the brushstrokes employed are short and dash like.  Occasionally one sees the evidence of drawn thin lines and outlines of shapes.  There is also some recognizable imagery and symbols.  In the lower right hand you can even see a hand and a "G clef" symbol used in musical notation and on the left the body of a guitar. This is the first form of Cubism, called Analytic Cubism.  Analytic cubism explores objects by taking them apart and reassembling them almost in a geometric and analytical fashion.  In all forms of cubism the artist fractures the picture plane and no longer pays attention to the rules concerning illusionistic representation, specifically the rules governing linear perspective and chiaroscuro.  In favor of this, the artist is attempting to show the viewer every angle and point of view of a musician playing music all at the same time. 
Iconography: This painting represents a view of a musician (possibly a woman) playing music (Stokstad identifies a guitar or a zither).  In the lower right hand you can even see a hand and a "G clef" symbol used in musical notation and on the left the body of a guitar.  The text that is incorporated into the image, "Ma Jolie" is the title or some of the words to a popular French song.  However, iconographically this painting is more than just a depiction of a musician.  It is probably an attempt by the artist to illustrate the feeling or experience of being in the presence of a musician performing the song.   Not only is the artist attempting to show the viewer every angle and point of view of a musician playing music all at the same time he is also showing you every moment of the performance.  Picasso is also showing you time.
Analytic Cubism is like a logic puzzle. It is cold and dispassionate, and meant to provoke thought in the viewer. It can be said that Picasso was playing mind games with the viewing public, he wanted them to analyze the work, and figure out was it was.  Or possibly to show how it feels for the artist to view a musician. In essence, everything was broken down to its' most simplified shape or form.  In a way, Picasso is breaking down and abstracting the idea of how it feels to experience being around a musician rather than just seeing a scene that contains the musician.
Context: Many are quick to disregard the work that Picasso did in this early Cubist phase as simplistic, or that he was without talent. However, it must be remembered that Picasso was painting on the level of a master artist at age thirteen. When one is that talented, they are free to explore other avenues of expression. He was, in his own words, constantly trying to learn how to paint like a child, free from the constraints of classical training.

 
 

Picasso. Glass and Bottle of Suze. 1912.
pasted paper, gouache, and charcoal 25"x19"
Washington Univ. Gallery, St. Louis Missouri
Form: This is done using papier collé, which is just French for collage. It is done in the cubist manner, and may fall under the auspices of synthetic cubism, where other objects are combined with the painting or drawing to create a finished work. Iconography and Context;
The following is quoted from,  Jean Sutherland Boggs 
http://wuga.wustl.edu/art/imgLarge/30lg.html
Three of the clippings in the Washington University's Glass and Bottle of Suze refer to incidents
 during the First Balkan War in which Turkey was trying to defend the Ottoman Empire against  Bulgaria, Serbia, and Greece. As Leighten has pointed out, the dispatches (two here by Pal Erio)  are vivid and make the horrors of war, with winter and the wounded and dying, particularly harrowing. Finally Leighten found even more significance in the fact that the newsprint that forms a left-hand column, as observed by Daix and Rosselet, records the meeting of 40,000 socialists at Prè-Saint-Gervais to protest any involvement in war. These blocks of newsprint, now very much browner than they would have been but nevertheless shadowed by Picasso with touches of charcoal, cut or torn carelessly, pasted somewhat unevenly and certainly placed apparently haphazardly so that some have to be read upside down, do remind us of a world that is murky, disturbing and, in fact, disintegrating. This is one level of meaning in Glass and Bottle of Suze.
 Leighten ignores the fact that there are other pieces of newsprint which come from serialized fiction in Le Journal, a novel by Abel Hermant (1862-1950) about some of the most snobbish and frivolous aspects of Parisian life. In their very silliness they represent an antidote to the Balkan Wars and socialism, or at least an expression of the absurdity of contrasts in the society in which Picasso was living. Where are we with the seeming ambiguities of the Glass and Bottle of Suze in the contrasts between the serious if obscured images of war and demands for social reform suggested by the newspaper clippings, and the clarity and decisiveness of the world of frivolous fiction and the bottle of Suze? Did Picasso ever expect that someone would read those newspaper clippings which he pasted together almost illegibly and which only can be read with photographs or by taking the papier collè down from a wall and putting it on a table? Perhaps he enjoyed the knowledge that certain secrets had to be unravelled before the work could be understood. Over thirty years later his young companion Françoise Gilot asked him about his papiers collès, which she herself then believed was "a kind of by-product or perhaps even the fading-out of Cubist painting." Picasso denied this and said,
We tried to get rid of trompe l'oeil to find a trompe l'esprit. We didn't any longer want to fool the eye; we wanted to fool the mind. The sheet of newspaper was never used in order to make a newspaper.... This displaced object has entered a universe for which it was not made and where it retains, in a measure, its strangeness. And this strangeness was what we wanted to make people think about because we were quite aware that our world was becoming very strange and not exactly reassuring. [5] We are still left uncertain that we have unravelled all the mysteries of this provocative work. As we look at it we can even discover that its more frivolous parts form the image of a man, the table his torso, the light brown gouache vertical at the left a leg with a foot standing on the bottom of the sheet of paper, the black zigzag the other leg, the cork a head undeniably small and modestly bowed, and a spiral of black charcoal around the stem of the glass a hand holding it toward us in a toast. The Glass and Bottle of Suze may reveal other secrets still."

Picasso. Still Life with Chair-Caning. 1912
Oil and oilcloth on canvas, with rope frame, 27 x 35 cm (10 5/8 x 13 3/4 in);.
Musee Picasso, Paris
Form: The is Synthetic Cubism. It has crawn and painted work, as well as collage and three dimensional objects. Iconography: according to the Zimmerlin museum, " in Still Life with Chair Caning (1912), Picasso introduced into the work a piece of oilcloth printed with chair caning. On one level, the introduction of collage elements to their analytical cubist works allowed Picasso and Braque to explore various color and textural elements. As Picasso maintained in 1964, “The purpose of papier collé was to give the idea that different textures can enter into a composition to become the reality in the painting that competes with the reality in nature.” 
Context: It is, in a way, just another form of analytic cubism in that it is still a game, a puzzle. It fools around with the questions of 'what is painted and what is real?' It may be asking the viewer to question how they themselves view the world around them.

 
Picasso. Three Musicians 1921
Form: Synthetic Cubism, very flat, simplified, no visual depth. The composition is symmetrical and the colors used are mostly primary and saturated.  Iconography According to the Philadelphia museum, "Three Musicians provides a grand summation of Pablo Picasso's decade-long exploration of Synthetic Cubism, with its flat, patterned shapes, although painted in oil, echoing the cut and pasted papers of his collages of the period. Music was a favorite Cubist theme, and here Picasso equips Harlequin with a violin, Pierrot with a recorder, and the monk with an accordion. All three characters, which figure importantly in the history of painting and in Picasso's own earlier work, are derived from Italian, French, and Spanish popular theater and carnival traditions, but the artist had also encountered them more directly during recent visits to Italy as the set designer for Sergei Diaghilev's ballet. Indeed, the stagelike space of this monumental composition may be traced to Picasso's theatrical work. Quite probably a portrayal of Picasso himself (Harlequin) and two poet friends, the painting presents an allegory of the artist as performer, a major theme of Picasso's highly autobiographical work throughout his long life."
Context: Picasso was a performer of sorts, as an artist and as a believer in social reform. He was never afraid to use his art to make his views or his opinion known.

 
Picasso. Girl Before a Mirror. 1932
Form: Cubist work in which Picasso begins to show his penchant for African masks (note the painted, mask-like quality of the face) and has often been accused of being hostile towards women because of this unflattering view of the body. A pendulous, rounded belly and spheres for breasts suggest a not-so-suble dehumanization of the young woman. There is a symmetry in the composition, if you were to cut the painting in half you would have two different paintings.  Iconography:  "In Girl before a Mirror, Picasso proceeds from "his intense feeling for the girl, whom he endowed with a corresponding vitality. He paints the body contemplated, loved and self-contemplating. The vision of another's body becomes an intensely rousing and mysterious process." To be sure, it may have been less the particular psychology of the passive Marie-Thérèse that served Picasso than her suitability as a vessel for primal feelings; indeed, that she did
 not have a salient personality (such as that possessed by Dora Maar who was to replace her in Picasso's affections four years later) may have facilitated the artist's transformation of her into a quasi-mythical being. Picasso has a remarkable ability to empathically displace the egos of his models, male or female. This young girl's act of self-contemplation may well have been banal. If so, the very commonplaceness of the experience contributed to the universality of the insight which Picasso's genius has distilled from it." For the entire, full pages of in-depth analysis of this work go to http://www.tamu.edu/mocl/picasso/works/1932/opp32-01.html
Context: According to a Time article by Robert Hughes, "He was a superstitious, sarcastic man, sometimes rotten to his children, often beastly to his women. He had contempt for women artists. His famous remark about  women being "goddesses or doormats" has rendered him odious to feminists, but women tended to walk into both roles open-eyed and eagerly, for his charm was legendary. Whole cultural industries derived from his much mythologized virility. He was the Minotaur in a canvas-and-paper labyrinth of his own construction."

Pablo Picasso, Guernica. 1937. oil on canvas 11'x25' Museo del Prado


Goya. Third of May 1808.
Form: This huge work uses a vocabulary of cubism and the painted forms look almost like a collage made from newspaper clippings.  The hatchmarks embedded in the forms look almost like the text found on a newspaper page as seen from a distance. Like a page from a newspaper this work is monochromatic and was painted in shades of black and white.  The arrangement of the composition is in a friezlike pattern.  There is no deep space and the viewer seems to be looking at a series of simulataneous events.  One is both inside and outside of buildings. Iconography and Context: 
"Picasso was moved to paint the huge mural Guernica shortly after German planes, acting on orders from Spain's authoritarian leader Francisco Franco, bombarded the Basque town of Guernica on April 26, 1937, during the Spanish civil war. Completed in less than two months, Guernica was hung in the Spanish Pavilion of the Paris International Exposition of 1937. The painting does not portray the event; rather, Picasso expressed his outrage by employing such imagery as the bull, the dying horse, a fallen warrior, a mother and dead child, a woman trapped in a burning building, another rushing into the scene, and a figure leaning  from a window and holding out a lamp. Despite the complexity of its symbolism, and the impossibility of definitive interpretation, Guernica makes an overwhelming impact in its portrayal of the horrors of war. It was on extended loan at New York City's Museum of Modern Art from 1939 until 1981, when it was returned to Spain at Madrid's Prado Museum. In 1992 the work was moved to the city's new museum of 20th-century art, the Reina Sofia Art Center. Dora Maar, Picasso's next companion to be portrayed, took photographs of Guernica while the work was in progress."
 http://digilander.libero.it/webpainter/indice/sezioni/text/picasso.html
Everywhere in the images are images of screaming suffering people and animals.  There are also two lamps.  These lights are surrounded by black halos and therefore do nothing to dispell the darkeness of the horrible events. At the far left of the composition is a mother holding a dead child who screams and cries.  This is a direct reference to Michelangelo's Pieta.  Above her is a bull which is both a martyr and a symbol of the dreadful Minotaur.  (also see the Legend of the Minotaur in Stokstad page 134). or go here :http://www.bulfinch.org/fables/bull20.html
In the center of the image is a foreshortened figure who looks very much like Caravaggio's depiction of the Conversion of Paul.  To the far right of the image we see a figure whose arms are thrown into the air who looks like a crucifixion or the martyr depicted in Goya's Third of May.
Context: This work is very much akin to Goyas' famous work, Third of May, where the lone revolutionary is surrounded by an almost beatific glow as he becomes a martyr. Guernica is filled withthe same iconographic tendencies, the woman holding the dead child on the left can be visually compared to Michaelangelos Pieta.

 
. Form: Study sketches for the mural Guernica. Basic graphite and charcoal on paper. Doodles that help an artist realize and define a final idea.  Iconography: Picasso was strongly opposed to the idea of war and detruction. In these two sketches the main figures are bulls and horses, obviously coomon animals in Spain. But, the secxond bull has been given a human head, perhaps to suggest a minotaur, or the way in which humans become transformed into beasts when engaged in war.
Context: There are hidden pictures within Guernica. "Picasso was very secretive about the meanings of Guernica and would only talk about it in a guarded and superficial way, yet the mysteries of its imagery have given rise to more art historical interpretations than any other picture in history. Surprisingly, nearly all of these scholarly interpretations are oblivious to Guernica's concealed imagery."
Here are some comparisons of the two images I found on this website;http://web.org.uk/picasso/guernica.html
The themes of death, the bullfight and the crucifixion are common to both pictures.  The Guernica bull is very like the bull in the drawing, both are huge,  in profile and stand motionless observing the scene before them.  There is a strong similarity in the dramatic clashing of light and dark  tones and the overhead light sources in both pictures.  In both Guernica and the 1934 drawing there is a second bull's head concealed below the horse. The head of the woman with the lamp in Guernica swoops downwards from the upper right corner in exactly the same way as does the head of the hidden Lucifer in the drawing. Lucifer means 'the light bringer' and is related symbolically to Venus, the Morning Star. She represents the evil of the physical world. The fallen warrior in Guernica is very similar to the central figure in the 1934 drawing, both are in the crucifixion pose and both have severed arms, identifying them symbolically with Picasso. The fallen warrior, like the central figure in the drawing, is also relatable to Parsifal, because of the broken sword in his hand. Parsival was given a magnificent sword which breaks in two at a crucial moment in battle.
In the centre of Guernica there is a human skull concealed within the body and legs of the wounded horse. Both pictures contain the same overlaying of horse and skull in the centre. In Guernica the horse has been stabbed by a spear, a symbol representing Picasso-the first four letters of his name mean spear in Spanish. The diamond tip of the spear represents harlequin, who like Christ has a mystical power over death. The Guernica spear also has a relationship to the broad paintbrush in the 1934 drawing. This has been overlaid on to the skull within the area of the concealed horse. In Guernica we find the skull penetrated by a spear within the horse. Picasso would have certainly made the association between a wet paintbrush and a spear in his childhood. Therefore it seems plausible from the placing of the paintbrush in the 1934 drawing, that the Guernica spear, is also a cryptic representation of Picasso's paintbrush, partly because of its similar appearance and partly because of its connection to Picasso's remarks about painting being a weapon,
                          'No, painting is not made to decorate apartments. its
                          an offensive and defensive weapon against the
                          enemy.'
The Guernica spear penetrates a cryptic representation of Hitler in the centre of the composition. In the centre of the 1934 drawing there is also a concealed portrait of Hitler. In the 1934 drawing, Picasso takes possession of the spear from Klingsor, who is strongly associated with Hitler. In Guernica, the artist continues this Wagnerian narrative by stabbing Hitler with the spear, which has now been transformed into a talisman of Picasso's personal mystical symbols.
                     Picasso was very secretive about the meanings of Guernica and
                     would only talk about it in a guarded and superficial way, yet the
                     mysteries of its imagery have given rise to more art historical
                     interpretations than any other picture in history. Surprisingly, nearly
                     all of these scholarly interpretations are oblivious to Guernica's
                     concealed imagery.
                     © Mark Harris 1996, 1997
To read about all the hidden images, go here, http://web.org.uk/picasso/guernica.html
If the link to the Uk article is down, here it is;
There are so many similarities between 1934 drawing and Guernica that it seems certain to be an important but unknown precursor to Picasso's greatest painting.
 Like the drawing, Guernica is also full of hidden images and themes, consequently, almost every line and shape in it is meaningful, either in the context of what it represents or what it is concealing.
 
 
 
 
 
 

mono.chro.mat.ic adj [L monochromatos, fr. Gk monochromatos, fr. mon- + chromat-, chroma color] (1822) 1 a: having or consisting of one color or hue b: monochrome 2 2: consisting of radiation of a single wavelength or of a very small range of wavelengths 3: of, relating to, or exhibiting monochromatism -- mono.chro.mat.i.cal.ly adv -- mono.chro.ma.tic.i.ty n