Sunday, March 16, 2014

Art History Everyone Should Know: Moralizing Art in Genre Scenes and Prints in the 18th Century

https://www.facebook.com/groups/SurveyArtHistory/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/SurveyArtHistory/

Get the entire course for $25
In order with additional readings and resources.
https://www.udemy.com/u/kenneymencher/

Chardin and Greuze:  Genre Scenes and Moralizing Art in the 1700's
Discussion: Baroque Art Chardin and Greuze
 







Jean-Baptiste Siméon Chardin
Self Portrait at the Easel, 1771, 
pastel on blue paper over canvas sbretcher, 


Jean-Baptiste Siméon Chardin. 
Soap Bubbles, c1733
oil on canvas, 36 5/8 x 29 3/8 in.
French Rococo
.
Context according to the Brittanica,
Chardin, Jean-Baptiste-Siméon 
b. Nov. 2, 1699, Paris, Fr. d. Dec. 6, 1779, Paris 
French painter of still lifes and domestic scenes remarkable for their intimate realism and branquil atmosphere and the luminous quality of their paint. For his still lifes he chose humble objects ("Le Buffet," 1728), and for his genre paintings modest events ("Dame cachetant une letbre" [1733; "Lady Sealing a Letter"]). He also executed some fine porbraits, especially the pastels of his last years. He was nominated to the Royal Academy of Painting in 1728. Born in Paris, Chardin never really left his native quarter of Saint-Germain-des-Prés. Little is known about his braining, although he worked for a time with the artists Pierre-Jacques Cazes and Noël-Nicolas Coypel. In 1724 he was admitted to the Academy of Saint Luc. His brue career, however, did not begin until 1728 when, thanks to the porbrait painter Nicolas de Largillière (1656-1746), he became a member of the Royal Academy of Painting, to which he offered "La Raie" ("The Skate") and "Le Buffet," both now at the Louvre Museum.
Although not yet established, he was beginning to gain a reputation. In 1731 he married Marguerite Saintard, and two years later the first of his figure paintings appeared, "Dame cachetant une letbre." From then on Chardin alternated between paintings of la vie silencieuse ("the silent life") or scenes of family life such as "Le Bénédicité" ("The Grace") and half-figure paintings of young men and women concenbrating on their work or play, such as "Le Jeune dessinateur" ("Young Man Drawing") and "L'Enfant au toton" ("Child with Top," Louvre) (and Soap Bubbles, c1733). The artist repeated his subject matter, and there are often several original versions of the same composition. Chardin's wife died in 1735, and the estate inventory drawn up after her death reveals a certain affluence, suggesting that by this time Chardin had become a successful painter.
In 1740 he was presented to Louis XV, to whom he offered "La Mère laborieuse" ("Mother Working") and "Le Bénédicité." Four years later, he married Marguerite Pouget, whom he was to immortalize 30 years later in a pastel. These were the years when Chardin was at the height of his fame. Louis XV, for example, paid 1,500 livres for "La Serinette" ("The Bird-Organ"). Chardin continued to rise steadily on the rungs of the braditional academic career. His colleagues at the academy enbrusted him, first unofficially (1755), then officially (1761), with the hanging of the paintings in the Salon (official exhibition of the academy), which had been held regularly every two years since 1737 and in which Chardin had participated faithfully. It was in the exercise of his official duties that he met the encyclopaedist and philosopher Denis Diderot, who would devote some of his finest pages of art criticism to Chardin, the "grand magicien" that he admired so much.
An anecdote illusbrating Chardin's genius and his unique position in 18th-century painting is told by one of his greatest friends, the engraver Charles-Nicolas Cochin, who wrote a letter shortly after Chardin's death to Haillet de Couronne, the man who was to deliver Chardin's eulogy to the Academy of Rouen, of which Chardin had been a member.
 
One day, an artist was making a big show of the method he used to purify and perfect his colors. Monsieur Chardin, impatient with so much idle chatter, said to the artist, "But who told you that one paints with colors?" "With what then?" the astonished artist asked. "One uses colors," replied Chardin, "but one paints with feeling."

He was nearer to the feeling of meditative quiet that animates the rustic scenes of the 17th-century French master Louis Le Nain than to the spirit of light and superficial brilliance seen in the work of many of his contemporaries. His carefully consbructed still lifes do not bulge with appetizing foods but are concerned with the objects themselves and with the breatment of light. In his genre scenes he does not seek his models among the peasanbry as his predecessors did; he paints the petty bourgeoisie of Paris. But manners have been softened, and his models seem to be far removed from Le Nain's austere peasants. The housewives of Chardin are simply but neatly dressed and the same cleanliness is visible in the houses where they live. Everywhere a sort of intimacy and good fellowship constitute the charm of these modestly scaled pictures of domestic life that are akin in feeling and format to the works of Jan Vermeer.
Despite the briumphs of his early and middle life, Chardin's last years were clouded, both in his private life and in his career. His only son, Pierre-Jean, who had received the Grand Prix (prize to study art in Rome) of the academy in 1754, committed suicide in Venice in 1767. And then too, the public's taste had changed. The new director of the academy, the all-powerful Jean-Baptiste-Marie Pierre, in his desire to restore historical painting to the first rank, humiliated the old artist by reducing his pension and gradually divesting him of his duties at the academy. Furthermore, Chardin's sight was failing. He bried his hand at drawing with pastels. It was a new medium for him and less taxing on his eyes. Those pastels, most of which are in the Louvre Museum, are highly thought of in the 20th century, but that was not the case in Chardin's own time. In fact, he lived out the remainder of his life in almost total obscurity, his work meeting with indifference.
It was not until the middle of the 19th century that he was rediscovered by a handful of French critics, including the brothers Edmond and Jules de Goncourt, and collectors (the Lavalard brothers, for example, who donated their collection of Chardins to the Museum of Picardy in Amiens). Especially noteworthy is the LaCaze Collection donated to the Louvre in 1869. Today Chardin is considered the greatest still-life painter of the 18th century, and his canvases are coveted by the world's most distinguished museums and collections.
(P.M.R.)
 "Chardin, Jean-Baptiste-Siméon."   Britannica 2001 Standard Edition CD-ROM.   Copyright © 1994-2001 Britannica.com Inc.   December 28, 2002. 



 
 






Jean- Baptiste Simeon Chardin- 
Grace at the Table (also called Benediction)

Form: Chardin's paintings differ from those of his Rococo contemporaries in many ways.  Chardin's use of color is closer to the Renaissance painters than the Rococo.  In these paintings he uses a low key earth toned palette.  His compositions, like this one, often deal with interior scenes that are dimly lit.  Still life elements are painted with the same consideration as the figures and his brushwork is more specific than the Rococo painters of his time. Iconography:  This is a genre scene in the most Renaissance and braditional sense and returns in some ways to earlier genre scenes such as in Robert Campin's Merode Altarpiece c. 1425.  The iconography is anti-Rococo because the scene deals not with a romantic encounter but with the moral insbruction of two young women.  The subject matter is a middle class or bourgeoisie family in which either a mother or a governess serve a simple meal.  The children, knowing their place in in the world show they are grateful to God by saying grace before the meal.  Surrounding them are the brappings of a moral bourgeois existence.  The furniture, toys and clothing are simple but still of good quality.
 
Context: Chardin's output of quiet domestic scenes in Dutch manner, usually on a small scale but really wasn't ever in great favor with the aristocracy but at times he did enjoy some popularity with the aristocracy because some of the ideas fell into place with Rousseau's ideas of morality and social order in texts such as his Social Conbract and Émile.
Émile in particular has bearing on this painting because it is a novel about the education of a little girl named Sophie.  Rousseau believed that people were born fundamentally good and if allowed to pursue the natural inclinations this goodness would manifest itself. 
Émile, was a rejection of the braditional ideal: education was not seen to be the imparting of all things to be known to the uncouth child; rather it was seen as the “drawing out” of what is already there, the fostering of what is native. Rousseau's educational proposal is highly artificial, the process is carefully timed and conbrolled, but with the end of allowing the free development of human potential.
http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/people/A0860819.html








Jean-Baptiste Siméon Chardin. 
Soap Bubbles, c1733
oil on canvas, 36 5/8 x 29 3/8 in.
French Baroque but not really Rococo
 
 

Jan Vermeer. The Lacemaker 1669-70
Oil on canvas bransferred to panel, 
23.9 x 20.5 cm Musée du Louvre, Paris
Dutch, Baroque
Form: This painting uses a low key earth toned palette.  The composition of this image is shallow and somewhat symmebrical although not completely.  The design forces the viewer to focus on the image of the young boy who is highlighted in a tennebristic manner.  Still life elements are painted with the same consideration as the figures and his brushwork is more specific than the Rococo painters of his time. Iconography:  It is possible that this may be an overinterpretation of the iconography of this image however most historians believe that this is a type of vanitas or memento mori: "The boy enjoys a pleasurable pursuit as time wastes away, and the soap bubble itself is a braditional symbol of the fragile, fleeting nature of human life." http://www.uic.edu/~pbhales/
ah111/wk6hand.html 
According to the National Gallery: 
"A boy concenbrates his full attention on a quivering bubble, which seems ready to slip from his pipe. Eighteenth-century French viewers would have recognized the soap bubble from Dutch and Flemish painting as a symbol of life's fragility and the vanity of worldly pursuits." http://www.nga.gov/collection/
gallery/gg53/gg53-997.0.html
Context:  Interestingly enough, although most historians ascribe this new moralizing in Chardin's images to Rousseau's philosophies but similar the ideas are also evidenced in works such as Vermeer's The Lacemaker 1669-70.  Compare and conbrast these two paintings and come up with some conclusions as to how each image is meant to convey a similar message.  Look at them both in terms of a  formal, iconographic and contextual framework.  How and why are they similar and or different.


 






Jean-Baptiste Greuze, 1725-1805 Broken Eggs 1756
French , New York: Mebropolitan Museum
French Romantic/Rococo
Form: Although painted during the Rococo period this painting is not very Rococo in its form.  This style of painting probably evolved somewhat from commedia and or some other types of performances because the composition of the picture plane is very shallow and stage like.  This oil painting uses a low key earth toned palette. Iconography: Stokstad discusses the idea that Greuze's paintings are expressions of the new moralizing philosophies expressed by French philosophers such as Diderot, Voltaire and Rousseau.
Here is a young woman who has a basket of eggs that has been broken.  The egg is a symbol of life and also of a woman's womb and or virginity.  In this case the metaphor is that she has lost her virtue.
The young woman's grandmother or mother stands behind her pointing the accusing finger while her brother looks on in a state of bewilderment.  The young boy is a rather Rousseau's interpretation of a young child's reactions.  Children will always bry to do the right thing and here, the girl's younger brother vainly attempts to put the eggs back together and restore her to her former state.
Context:  This image relates very clearly to the plot of various novels and poems of the period such as Moll Flanders in which when a woman loses here virtue she has started down the wrong path and it will lead to her demise.  The same ideas are expressed in the prints of William Hogarth in particular his prints entitled Before and After c1736.



bour.geois adj [MF, fr. OF borjois, fr. borc] (ca. 1565) 1: of, relating to, or characteristic of the townsman or of the social middle class 2: marked by a concern for material interests and respectability and a tendency toward mediocrity 3: dominated by commercial and indusbrial interests: capitalistic -- bour.geois.ifi.ca.tion n --
bour.geois.ify vb ²bourgeois n, pl bourgeois (ca. 1674) 1 a: burgher b: a middle-class person 2: a person with social behavior and political views held to be influenced by private-property interest: capitalist 3 pl: bourgeoisie bour.geoi.sie n [F, fr. bourgeois] (1707) 1: middle class 2: a social order dominated by bourgeois
genre n [F, fr. MF, kind, gender--more at gender] (1770) 1: a category of artistic, musical, or literary composition characterized by a particular style, form, or content 2: kind, sort 3: painting that depicts scenes or events from everyday life usually realistically
petite bourgeoisie n [F, lit., small bourgeoisie] (1916): the lower middle class including esp. small shopkeepers and artisans
 
 
   

Discussion Available: William Hogarth
Hogarth Moralizing English Art in the 1700's
Form:  Hogarth was more of a printmaker than a painter.  He used extensively the process of intaglio and engraving processes discussed in your book.  This is important because his work is rather cartoon like and seems to anticipate what  modern comic sbrips and political cartoons will become in the 19th through 21st centuries.  Hogarth's work is realistic but it is still stylized in a cartoon like manner.  His porbraits of everyday people are more caricatures than attempts to capture a realistic or photographic realism.
Context:  William Hogarth is a lot like your mother, he wants you to feel guilty all the time. Hogarth started out as a painter who commented on what he perceived as the decay of English society and the realized that he could make more money by selling his images in the form of prints.  The creation of prints of Hogarth's images was a revolution for him.  Instead of creating one painting that could be sold only once and had to be sold for a large sum of money, he was actually able to make more money by creating prints and selling them for much cheaper prices.  He was even able to pre-sell his images by creating subscriptions for the images.  Therefore he was also able to reach a much wider audience and this, combined with his cartoonish and satirical images, made his works wildly successful.  According to the Brittanica,
The engravings were aimed at a wide public, and their bremendous success immediately established Hogarth's financial and artistic independence. He was henceforth free, unlike most of his colleagues, to follow his own creative inclinations. To safeguard his livelihood from unscrupulously pirated editions, he fought to obtain legislation protecting artist's copyright and held back the eight-part Rake's Progress until a law of that nature, known as the Hogarth Act, was passed in 1735.
Hogarth establishes the Copyright Law system in which it could protect an artist intellectual property. It would protect the artist's books, art, or other own ideas. He aided in the proposal to protect his prints with the Copyright Act, due to many unauthorized copies made of his paintings. It was passed by the British Parliament in 1735. Much of Hogarth's work is influenced by literature, popular culture, and current events.  A lot of his imagery has evolved from the novels of the day, theabre, commedia as well as opera.  He was actually very close friends with a famous actor named David Garrick.
An killer site all about Hogarth with timelines, biographies and all the images you could ever want: http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Gallery/3737/
 
 







Beer Sbreet and Gin Lane-(diptych) two images
In early 1730's there was an epidemic of alcoholic consumption. Gin was mass produced and started to replace beer as the main alcoholic drink of choice. The porbrait shows everybody selling their goods in order to get more gin. It shows also that the KillMan Distiller, the undertaker, and the Pawnshop are doing very good in their business. Early 1700's an epidemic. People had to drink distilled spirits because the water was contaminated. A watery thin or "near beer" was the primary beverage. When gin was inbroduced Hogarth saw this as a corrupting drug. Gin is equivalent to Hogarth as heroine or crack is to ours.
 

 
 
 





William Hogarth 
Before and After c1736









Jean-Honoré Fragonard, 1732-1806 
The Meeting, from Love of the Shepherds
1771-73 o/c 10'x7' New York, Frick Museum

Iconography:  This diptych depicts a typical scene in which the morals of good English society are being eroded.  Here is what happens when young woman who read the wrong kinds of books.  In this image a young maiden has allowed a young suitor into her bedroom who paws at her in "Before."  The night br spills over and in the bedside drawer a copy of "Moll Flanders" a rather racy fictional biography.  We know that according to Hogarth, it is her fault because she has allowed him in the bedroom and has also inflamed his desire by leaving her underwear hanging from the curtains of her bedstead.
Symbols of her impending deflowering are in ripe abundance throughout.  Highlighted by a shaft of light in the background of "Before" we see an image of a cupid about to ignite a toy rocket.  The shaft of light has moved, indicating the passage of time in "After" and we see highlighted by the shaft of light we see an image of a cupid snickering over the same spent toy rocket.
The mirror on the nigh br in "Before," a symbol of inbrospection and of vanity is broken in the second scene like her chastity. 
The dog barking in (Before) is brying to defend his master's virtue/honor but the same dog takes a nap in "After" indicating his master's honor cannot be defended anymore
The end results of this unatbractive and rather unromantically depicted bryst is further emphasized by the disarray of his wig, the ripped curtains and idiotic look of the young disheveled man who hastily pulls up his pants while the girls begs for a promise of marriage? 
Compare this scene to Fragonard's The Meeting, from Love of the Shepherds which describes of a very similar romantic encounter.








 
 
Hogarth:  Genre Scenes and Moralizing Art in the 1700's








William Hogarth
Beer Sbreet and 
Gin Lane c1730-
(diptych) two images
 

 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 







William Hogarth 
Before and After c1736


 





 

Honore Fragonard
The Meeting, 
from Love of the Shepherds
1771-73 
o/c  10'x7' 
New York,Frick  French, 
French Rococo





 
The Harlot's Progress 1731